When you’re deciding between two tenants – a well-known franchise and a local operator – it’s easy to assume the bigger brand is the safer bet. But in my experience, that’s not always true.
Many franchise rollouts look exciting at first. They have marketing budgets, strong branding, and lots of buzz. But a lot of those concepts are new, and not all of them survive. I’ve seen plenty of “hot” brands expand quickly, request large tenant improvement packages, and then struggle just a few years later.
That’s why I always dig into the financial statements. Sometimes a franchisee with multiple locations looks impressive on the surface, but when you study the numbers closely, the picture changes. On the other hand, a local tenant with two or three successful locations may actually be the more stable operator.
I once worked on a deal where the choice was between a major corporate restaurant and a local family-owned concept. My client – who happened to be a CPA and attorney – analyzed the financials and chose the local tenant. Twenty years later, that local restaurant is still operating successfully, while the corporate concept has closed many of its locations.
Another factor is tenant improvement dollars. Many national or franchise tenants require large TI packages. If you do provide TI, make sure you invest in infrastructure that stays with the real estate – things like grease traps or hood systems.
Rockstar Tip: Don’t lease based on logos. Study the financials, evaluate the operator, and remember that sometimes the strongest tenant is the one right in your backyard.